Current:Home > InvestNo direct evidence COVID began in Wuhan lab, US intelligence report says -Capitatum
No direct evidence COVID began in Wuhan lab, US intelligence report says
TrendPulse View
Date:2025-04-06 15:07:38
The U.S. intelligence community has found no direct evidence of a "biosafety incident" or of the pre-pandemic presence of the virus that causes COVID-19 at a laboratory in Wuhan, China, according to a report released Friday by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
The newly declassified document added details to a growing body of inconclusive evidence about the origins of the pandemic.
The 10-page report, which was mandated by legislation passed by Congress and signed into law in March by President Biden, looked specifically at potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, but did not make an assessment of the likelihood the outbreak began there.
While some lab researchers heightened their risk of accidental exposure to viruses at WIV through insufficient safety precautions, and "several" fell ill in the fall of 2019, the report found, U.S. intelligence agencies remain divided on whether the pandemic began through natural transmission or by accident.
The report notes that some scientists at the institute genetically engineered coronaviruses through common practices, but that there was "no information" indicating such work was done on the virus that causes COVID-19. "Almost all" the agencies studying the issue assess the virus "was not genetically engineered," it said.
The report also says that several WIV researchers showed some symptoms "consistent with but not diagnostic of COVID-19" in the fall of 2019, with some showing symptoms unrelated to the disease, and some confirmed to have been sick with other, unrelated illnesses.
The timing and type of the workers' illnesses "neither supports nor refutes either hypothesis of the pandemic's origins because the researchers' symptoms could have been caused by a number of diseases and some of the symptoms were not consistent with COVID-19," the report said.
China has consistently denied that the virus originated in the Wuhan lab and a spokesperson for its Foreign Ministry previously accused the U.S. of a "politicization of origin tracing."
In a pair of declassified assessments released last year, ODNI revealed that U.S. intelligence agencies had coalesced around two "plausible" theories – that the virus was the result of natural transmission or the result of a lab accident.
In Friday's report, their breakdown was consistent. Five U.S. intelligence entities continue to believe that the virus originated naturally. Two, the FBI and the Department of Energy, favor the lab leak theory, albeit "for different reasons." And the CIA and another agency have been unable to make a determination without additional information.
"The Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese People's Liberation Army have some serious explaining to do," said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner and Chairman of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Brad Wenstrup in a joint statement, adding their view that ODNI's report added "credence" to the lab leak theory.
"While we appreciate the report from ODNI, the corroboration of all available evidence along with further investigation into the origins of COVID-19 must continue," they said.
In public testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee in March, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines said the lack of cooperation from the Chinese government was a "key, critical gap" in explaining the pandemic's origins.
"It is a really challenging issue," Haines told the panel in March. "And I think our folks honestly are trying to do the best that they can to figure out what, exactly, happened, based on the information they have available to them."
- In:
- COVID-19
veryGood! (2743)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Paul Simon, graceful poet and musical genius, gets his documentary due 'In Restless Dreams'
- College Football Playoffs new six-year contract starting in 2026 opens door to expansion
- How the AP reported that someone with access to Bernie Moreno’s email created adult website profile
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Ree Drummond clears up weight loss medication rumors: 'I did not take Ozempic, Wegovy'
- America is getting green and giddy for its largest St. Patrick’s Day parades
- Kelly Clarkson Countersues Ex Brandon Blackstock Amid 3-Year Legal Battle
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- 11-foot, 750-pound blind alligator seized from Hamburg, NY, home, gator used as attraction
Ranking
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- WWE WrestleMania 40 match card: 10 matches, what to know three weeks ahead of event
- Coroner’s probe reveals Los Angeles maintenance man was Washington rape suspect believed long dead
- The Supreme Court won’t intervene in a dispute over drag shows at a public university in Texas
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Love Is Blind's Cameron Hamilton Reveals Why He and Lauren Weren't at the Season 6 Reunion
- US to investigate Texas fatal crash that may have involved Ford partially automated driving system
- Parents of school shooting victims vow more action - even after shooter's parents convicted
Recommendation
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Judge delays Trump’s hush-money criminal trial until mid-April, citing last-minute evidence dump
Michigan prosecutor on why she embarked on landmark trials of school shooter's parents
A local Arizona elections chief who quit in a ballot counting dispute just got a top state job
The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
A Gas Tanker Crashed in Birmingham and Spilled 2,100 Gallons Into Nearby Village Creek. Who Is Responsible?
Q&A: What’s So Special About a New ‘Eye in the Sky’ to Track Methane Emissions
Q&A: What’s So Special About a New ‘Eye in the Sky’ to Track Methane Emissions